Lopez v. Central Bank of Tampa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lopez v. Central Bank of Tampa

186 So. 2d 298, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5356

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 6, 1966

DocketNo. 5882

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 298 (Lopez v. Central Bank of Tampa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Central Bank of Tampa, 186 So. 2d 298, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5356 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a mortgage foreclosure action which held the mortgage of the appellant-plaintiff to be subordinated and inferior to that of the appellee-defendant

It is a well-established rule of law that the chancellor’s findings of fact and .conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are .clearly erroneous.

It is incumbent upon the appellant to clearly demonstrate reversible error, which upon careful consideration of the record, we find the appellant herein has failed to do. Therefore, the final decree appealed .is hereby affirmed.

‘ Allen; c. j., Hobson, j., and - SMITH, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a mortgage foreclosure action which held the mortgage of the appellant-plaintiff to be subordinated and inferior to that of the appellee-defendant

It is a well-established rule of law that the chancellor’s findings of fact and .conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are .clearly erroneous.

It is incumbent upon the appellant to clearly demonstrate reversible error, which upon careful consideration of the record, we find the appellant herein has failed to do. Therefore, the final decree appealed .is hereby affirmed.

‘ Allen; c. j., Hobson, j., and - SMITH, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 2d 298, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-central-bank-of-tampa-fladistctapp-1966.