Lopez v. Capra
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BALDEMIRO LOPEZ, Petitioner, -against- 18-CV-4392 (ALC)
MICHAEL CAPRA, Superintendent, ORDER Respondent.
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: As laid out in the Court’s Opinion and Order denying Petitioner Baldemiro Lopez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus at ECF No. 19, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional nght. Therefore, a certificate of appealability shall not be granted. See Hoffler v. Bezio, 726 F.3d 144, 154 (2d Cir. 2013); Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998); Rodriquez v. Scully, 905 F.2d 24, 24 (2d Cir. 1990).
The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner.
SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22, 2022 7 (ue New York, New York ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez v. Capra (Lopez v. Capra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.