Lopez-Perez v. Garland

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopez-Perez v. Garland. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F.4th 104
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 8, 2022·No. 21-1057E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 21-1057

LEONARDO FABIO LÓPEZ-PÉREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on February 22, 2022, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 6, replace "For the reasons that follow, we affirm." with "For the reasons that follow, we deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part for lack of jurisdiction."

On page 15, line 23, replace "For the foregoing reasons, the BIA's ruling is Affirmed." with " For the foregoing reasons, we deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part for lack of jurisdiction."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez-Perez v. Garland, (1st Cir. 2022).

Lopez-Perez v. Garland (Lopez-Perez v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.