Lopez (Juan) Vs. City Of Las Vegas Det. Ctr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUAN ACOSTA LOPEZ, No. 79623 Petitioner, vs. CITY OF LAS VEGAS DETENTION CENTER, Resi ondent.
T1
CLE BY
DEPU
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
This is an original pro se postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which petitioner appears to complain that his trial counsel was ineffective, particularly with regard to petitioner's request to withdraw his guilty plea and proceed to trial.
A challenge to a judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. See NRS 34.724; NRS 34.738; NRAP 22. Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised herein, we determine that our intervention is not warranted, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004)
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A <21110.
at .i; ;11
CPetitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
C.J.
Aoki. J. A6-'t PectAin ,J Pickering Hardesty
cc: Juan Acosta Lopez
Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ADP 2
•5- 413
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez (Juan) Vs. City Of Las Vegas Det. Ctr. (Lopez (Juan) Vs. City Of Las Vegas Det. Ctr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.