Lopez (Juan) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2013·No. 61668·Unpublished

Opinion

State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

To the extent that appellant sought to modify his sentence, appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was outside the scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Juan Fernando Lopez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 1947A 4'1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez (Juan) v. State, (Neb. 2013).

Lopez (Juan) v. State (Lopez (Juan) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. State
918 P.2d 321 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1996)
Hart v. State
1 P.3d 969 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)