Lopez, Dan v. RS Clark & Associates, Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopez, Dan v. RS Clark & Associates, Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 986
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 2013·No. 05-12-00868-CV·Published

Opinion

Order issued January 31, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas )))))))))))))))))))))))))))) No. 05-12-00868-CV ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

DAN LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

RS CLARK & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee

4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-07834-A 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT appellant’s motion for review of the

trial court’s order requiring additional security to supersede final judgment and enjoining asset

transfer to the extent the trial court’s order required appellant to supersede the award of attorney’s

fees. We REVERSE the trial court’s July 31, 2012 order enjoining appellant from transferring

assets and requiring him to provide additional security to supersede the final judgment on appeal and

deem appellant’s existing cash deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,074.70

sufficient to supersede the trial court’s judgment in this case.

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez, Dan v. RS Clark & Associates, Inc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Lopez, Dan v. RS Clark & Associates, Inc (Lopez, Dan v. RS Clark & Associates, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.