Lopes v. Adams
277 N.E.2d 672, 29 N.Y.2d 823, 327 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 961
This text of 277 N.E.2d 672 (Lopes v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lopes v. Adams, 277 N.E.2d 672, 29 N.Y.2d 823, 327 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 961 (N.Y. 1971).
Opinion
Motion granted. MVAIC lacks standing as an aggrieved party or otherwise to participate as a party to the appeal, its status as one entitled potentially to a right of contribution being insufficient (Nieves v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Auth., 24 N Y 2d 741, 1030; Mahar v. City of Albany, 303 N. Y. 672, cf. CPLR 1402).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mahar v. City of Albany
102 N.E.2d 832 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
277 N.E.2d 672, 29 N.Y.2d 823, 327 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopes-v-adams-ny-1971.