Loper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Loper v. State

1977 OK CR 8, 560 P.2d 204, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 706

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 5, 1977

DocketNo. F-76-594

StatusPublished

This text of 1977 OK CR 8 (Loper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loper v. State, 1977 OK CR 8, 560 P.2d 204, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 706 (Okla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Sandra Mae Turner Loper, hereinafter referred to as defendant was charged, tried and convicted in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF—75-2975, for the offense of Larceny of Merchandise from a Retailer, After Former Conviction of a Felony, and she was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of ten (10) years. From this judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

A careful reading of the record, and a study of the brief, reveal no assignment of error which would justify modification or reversal. Therefore, pursuant to this Court’s authority founded in 20 O.S.1971, § 49, we find the judgment and sentence should be, and hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Sandra Mae Turner Loper, hereinafter referred to as defendant was charged, tried and convicted in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF—75-2975, for the offense of Larceny of Merchandise from a Retailer, After Former Conviction of a Felony, and she was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of ten (10) years. From this judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

A careful reading of the record, and a study of the brief, reveal no assignment of error which would justify modification or reversal. Therefore, pursuant to this Court’s authority founded in 20 O.S.1971, § 49, we find the judgment and sentence should be, and hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1977 OK CR 8, 560 P.2d 204, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loper-v-state-oklacrimapp-1977.