Loper v. State

840 So. 2d 1139, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4082, 2003 WL 1560165
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-1026
StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 1139 (Loper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loper v. State, 840 So. 2d 1139, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4082, 2003 WL 1560165 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The officer’s failure to file a traffic citation with the court within five days after issuance to the violator, as required by section 316.650(3), Florida Statutes (2001), was not a jurisdictional prerequisite to the prosecution of the defendant. See State v. Hancock, 529 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The petition for writ of certiorari is

DENIED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hancock
529 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 So. 2d 1139, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4082, 2003 WL 1560165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loper-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.