Loori v. Loori
This text of 28 A.2d 288 (Loori v. Loori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the New Jersey Prerogative Court advised by Yice-Ordinary Fielder reversing a decree of the Hudson County Orphans Court which denied probate to a paper-writing purporting to be the last will and testament of Mary Loori, deceased, on the ground that the alleged will “is an unjust or unnatural will;” that due execution was not proved and that it was the result of undue influence.
The Prerogative Court, in reversing the decree, found the uncontradictcd testimony to be that the execution of the *317 will 'was attended with all the statutory formalities. We are in entire agreement with this conclusion. On the other main question of whether the testatrix was unduly influenced by the beneficiaries named, we are also in accord with the Vice-Ordinary that undue influence was not proved by the caveator.
We have carefully examined and considered the argument and briefs of the parties and conclude that the findings of facts of the learned Vice-Ordinary and his legal conclusions are amply supported by the proofs and the authorities cited by him.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodtne, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.2d 288, 132 N.J. Eq. 316, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loori-v-loori-nj-1942.