Loops LLC v. Phoenix Trading, Inc.
This text of Loops LLC v. Phoenix Trading, Inc. (Loops LLC v. Phoenix Trading, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
LOOPS LLC, LOOPS FLEXBRUSH LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
PHOENIX TRADING, INC., DBA AMERCARE PRODUCTS INC., WENDY HEMMING, Defendants-Appellees
H&L INDUSTRIAL, DOES, 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, Defendants ______________________
2017-1316 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:08-cv-01064- RSM, Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN MICHAEL HOGAN, San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by ROBERT STEELE, Miller & Steele, Oceanside, CA. BROOKS F. COOPER, Draneas & Huglin, PC, Lake Oswego, OR, argued for defendants-appellees. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Loops LLC v. Phoenix Trading, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loops-llc-v-phoenix-trading-inc-cafc-2018.