Loopo v. Paticoff

270 A.D. 941, 61 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered when she was struck by defendant’s taxicab, and action by her husband for expenses and loss of services. Order granting plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict in favor of defendant reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion denied, and the verdict reinstated, with costs. The setting aside of the verdict was not justified on the proof herein. (See Collins v. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 893.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loopo v. Paticoff, 270 A.D. 941, 61 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 941 (Loopo v. Paticoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holpp v. Carafa
8 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)