Looper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Looper v. State

182 S.W. 308

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Looper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 Tex. Crim. 144 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 12, 1916·No. No. 3890·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant pleaded guilty, waiving a jury, to violating the prohibition law, which was in force in Johnson county as a misdemeanor. The judge assessed the lowest punishment. There is no statement of facts, if any testimony was introduced on the trial. Neither is there a bill of exceptions. There is nothing that can be reviewed. Evidently the appeal was for delay merely.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant pleaded guilty, waiving a jury, to violating the prohibition law, which was in force in Johnson county as a misdemeanor. The judge assessed the lowest punishment. There is no statement of facts, if any testimony was introduced on the trial. Neither is there a bill of exceptions. There is nothing that can be reviewed. Evidently the appeal was for delay merely.

The judgment is affirmed.

Looper v. State, 182 S.W. 308 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

182 S.W. 308 (Looper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.