Looper (Dujuan) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Looper (Dujuan) v. State

DecidedDecember 11, 2014

Docket65608

StatusUnpublished

This text of Looper (Dujuan) v. State (Looper (Dujuan) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Looper (Dujuan) v. State, (Neb. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

suspect evidence or was improperly influenced by emotion. Looper's consecutive prison terms of 96-240 months, 19-60 months, and 19-72 months, fall within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, NRS 193.330(1)(a)(1); NRS 200.366(3)(c); NRS 200.485(2); NRS 200.730(1), and Looper has not demonstrated that these statutes are unconstitutional. See Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 347-48, 213 P.3d 476, 489-90 (2009). The sentence imposed is not so disproportionate to the gravity of the offenses as to shock the conscience, see CuIverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see Parrish v. State, 116 Nev. 982, 988-89, 12 P.3d 953, 957 (2000), and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

, C.J. Gibbon's

J. Pickering

1 Looper's fast track statement does not comply with the formatting requirements of NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4)-(5) because it does not have one-inch margins on all sides and contains a footnote which is not in the same size font as the text of the brief. We caution counsel that future failure to comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A )312TN. cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Patti, Sgro & Lewis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

suspect evidence or was improperly influenced by emotion. Looper's consecutive prison terms of 96-240 months, 19-60 months, and 19-72 months, fall within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, NRS 193.330(1)(a)(1); NRS 200.366(3)(c); NRS 200.485(2); NRS 200.730(1), and Looper has not demonstrated that these statutes are unconstitutional. See Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 347-48, 213 P.3d 476, 489-90 (2009). The sentence imposed is not so disproportionate to the gravity of the offenses as to shock the conscience, see CuIverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see Parrish v. State, 116 Nev. 982, 988-89, 12 P.3d 953, 957 (2000), and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

, C.J. Gibbon's

J. Pickering

1 Looper's fast track statement does not comply with the formatting requirements of NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4)-(5) because it does not have one-inch margins on all sides and contains a footnote which is not in the same size font as the text of the brief. We caution counsel that future failure to comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A )312TN. cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Patti, Sgro & Lewis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Looper (Dujuan) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/looper-dujuan-v-state-nev-2014.

Opinion

J. Pickering

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack