Looney v. State

8 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3230, 2009 WL 981343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2009·No. No. 1D09-1168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. This disposition is without prejudice to petitioner raising, by proper motion for postconviction relief in the trial court, a claim concerning the propriety of the jury instructions in light of our recent decision in Montgomery v. State, — So.3d —, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D360, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 12, 2009).

ALLEN, WOLF, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Looney v. State, 8 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3230, 2009 WL 981343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

8 So. 3d 453 (Looney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery v. State
70 So. 3d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)