Loonen v. Deitsch

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Loonen v. Deitsch

152 F. 1023, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 10, 1907·Published

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The demurrer to the bill on the grounds that it does not affirmatively allege that the complainant complied with the requirements of Act Feb. 20, 1905, c. 592, 33 Stat. 724 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 667], relating to registration of trade-marks, and that it does not allege any date of adoption and use of the trade-mark in suit in the United States, is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer within 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAZEL, District Judge.

The demurrer to the bill on the grounds that it does not affirmatively allege that the complainant complied with the requirements of Act Feb. 20, 1905, c. 592, 33 Stat. 724 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 667], relating to registration of trade-marks, and that it does not allege any date of adoption and use of the trade-mark in suit in the United States, is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer within 20 days.

Loonen v. Deitsch, 152 F. 1023, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082 (circtsdny 1907).

Pincite

152 F. 1023 (Loonen v. Deitsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.