Loonen v. Deitsch

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Loonen v. Deitsch

152 F. 1023, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 10, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 152 F. 1023 (Loonen v. Deitsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loonen v. Deitsch, 152 F. 1023, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082 (circtsdny 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The demurrer to the bill on the grounds that it does not affirmatively allege that the complainant complied with the requirements of Act Feb. 20, 1905, c. 592, 33 Stat. 724 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 667], relating to registration of trade-marks, and that it does not allege any date of adoption and use of the trade-mark in suit in the United States, is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer within 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAZEL, District Judge.

The demurrer to the bill on the grounds that it does not affirmatively allege that the complainant complied with the requirements of Act Feb. 20, 1905, c. 592, 33 Stat. 724 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 667], relating to registration of trade-marks, and that it does not allege any date of adoption and use of the trade-mark in suit in the United States, is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer within 20 days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 F. 1023, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loonen-v-deitsch-circtsdny-1907.