Loomis v. Township Board
This text of 1 McGrath 1346 (Loomis v. Township Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel respondent to include the amount of a certain bond and interest coupon in a tax levy.
Denied March 6, 1884.
Held, (1) that the facts set up by respondent in his return to [1350]*1350an order-to show cause, áre admitted by the relator if when an. issue is framed they are not submitted to the jury; (2) that How„ Stat., Sec. 8666, in providing that a peremptory mandamus shall be granted at once, where a verdict is found for relator, does not apply if material issues have not been submitted to the jury and found,in his favor; (3) that mandamus does not lie to compel a township to raise money to pay bonds so long as it is an open question whether the bonds are a legal obligation on the township, and whether the relator is a bona fide holder of them, as these are questions for the trial court, Brownell vs. Supervisors, 49 M., 414 (1341).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1346, 53 McGrath 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loomis-v-township-board-mich-1884.