Loomis v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Loomis v. State

285 A.D. 988, 138 N.Y.S.2d 661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1955

DocketClaim No. 31397

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 988 (Loomis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loomis v. State, 285 A.D. 988, 138 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing, after trial, a claim for damages for personal injuries, received while claimant was picking raspberries on a State reforestration area and public hunting ground in the town of German, Chenango County. The injuries were sustained when claimant fell into an abandoned well hidden by thick underbrush and near the foundation of a burned farmhouse and a granary and barn formerly standing on the property. The court below found that claimant was a licensee and relying on Le Roux v. State of New York (281 App. Div. 1065), held that the State was without actual or constructive notice of the existence of the well and was under no duty to inspect its lands to discover such dangers. Since the decision and judgment, the Court of Appeals has reversed the Le Roux case (307 N. Y. 397). Assuming claimant to have been an invitee, as we must under the ruling in the Le Roux case, we regard the issues of negligence as well as of causal relationship fully open for the Court of Claims to decide on the facts. We assume that the court below did not reach those issues in their entirety when it followed the Appellate Division in the Le Roux case. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered in the Court of Claims, with costs to abide the event. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing, after trial, a claim for damages for personal injuries, received while claimant was picking raspberries on a State reforestration area and public hunting ground in the town of German, Chenango County. The injuries were sustained when claimant fell into an abandoned well hidden by thick underbrush and near the foundation of a burned farmhouse and a granary and barn formerly standing on the property. The court below found that claimant was a licensee and relying on Le Roux v. State of New York (281 App. Div. 1065), held that the State was without actual or constructive notice of the existence of the well and was under no duty to inspect its lands to discover such dangers. Since the decision and judgment, the Court of Appeals has reversed the Le Roux case (307 N. Y. 397). Assuming claimant to have been an invitee, as we must under the ruling in the Le Roux case, we regard the issues of negligence as well as of causal relationship fully open for the Court of Claims to decide on the facts. We assume that the court below did not reach those issues in their entirety when it followed the Appellate Division in the Le Roux case. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered in the Court of Claims, with costs to abide the event. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 988, 138 N.Y.S.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loomis-v-state-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack