Loomis v. State
550 S.W.3d 581
Opinion
John Loomis appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Loomis argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that trial counsel failed to *582move for a mistrial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loomis v. State, 550 S.W.3d 581 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
550 S.W.3d 581 (Loomis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.