Loomis v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Loomis v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

71 A.D.2d 1040, 420 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 13, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 1040 (Loomis v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loomis v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 71 A.D.2d 1040, 420 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding, initiated in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated March 5, 1979, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint. Petitioner’s complaints of age and sex discrimination against her employer were fully investigated and the State Division of Human Rights found there was no probable cause to believe that the employer had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices. Since a review of the record considered as a whole discloses substantial evidentiary support for the later determination of the respondent board upholding that finding, we must confirm it (see Matter of Heron v Albany Law School of Union Univ., 57 AD2d 672). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding, initiated in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated March 5, 1979, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint. Petitioner’s complaints of age and sex discrimination against her employer were fully investigated and the State Division of Human Rights found there was no probable cause to believe that the employer had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices. Since a review of the record considered as a whole discloses substantial evidentiary support for the later determination of the respondent board upholding that finding, we must confirm it (see Matter of Heron v Albany Law School of Union Univ., 57 AD2d 672). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 1040, 420 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loomis-v-new-york-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack