Loomis v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

153 A.D. 938, 138 N.Y.S. 1126

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the words “ Grand St.” in the bill of lading indicate the address of the consignee, and the fact that there is a Grand street freight yard does hot create an ambiguity sufficient to justify submitting to the jury the question of whether the words ‘ ‘ Grand St. ” were used to designate such freight yard as a place of delivery. All concurred, except Kruse and Robson, JJ., who dissented.