Loomis v. M'Clintock

10 Watts 274
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1840·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

This is not the case of a- defective execution of a .power, as has been contended; for the executors had no power to sell until a certain period, which, had not arrived-at the time of the sale. The sale is therefore void, as is clearly shown by Justice Dallas, whose opinion we adopt. Here, time is not matter of form, but-substance; and the powers of the .executors depend on the intention of the testator, which w,as .to postpone the sale until his daugin ter Catherine attained the age of twenty-one years, or, in case of her death, until she would have attained that age.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loomis v. M'Clintock, 10 Watts 274 (Pa. 1840).

10 Watts 274 (Loomis v. M'Clintock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. Jones
118 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Satterfield v. Tate
64 S.E. 60 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Rice v. Tavernier
8 Minn. 248 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1863)
Gast v. Porter
13 Pa. 533 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850)