Loomis v. Marsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Loomis v. Marsh

215 A.D. 691

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order directing examination of third party before trial, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ' We think plaintiff has presented a ease of special circumstances justifying the examination of the witness sought to be examined under Civil Practice Act, section 288. The record shows a refusal by defendants to furnish the plaintiff with information in their possession to which the courts have decided plaintiff is entitled. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order directing examination of third party before trial, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ' We think plaintiff has presented a ease of special circumstances justifying the examination of the witness sought to be examined under Civil Practice Act, section 288. The record shows a refusal by defendants to furnish the plaintiff with information in their possession to which the courts have decided plaintiff is entitled. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Loomis v. Marsh, 215 A.D. 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

215 A.D. 691 (Loomis v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related