Loomis v. Loomis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Loomis v. Loomis

50 A.D.2d 600, 375 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 600 (Loomis v. Loomis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loomis v. Loomis, 50 A.D.2d 600, 375 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In consolidated proceedings, one, in a matrimonial action, to modify the provisions of a judgment of divorce with respect to child custody, and the other a habeas corpus proceeding, the parties cross-appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 25, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination which, inter alia, granted custody of the infant children of the parties to the respondent-appellant mother. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The record amply supports the finding by Special Term that the mother is a fit custodian and is entitled to custody of the children returned to her. We have examined her contentions with respect to her application for counsel fees and find them to be without merit. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In consolidated proceedings, one, in a matrimonial action, to modify the provisions of a judgment of divorce with respect to child custody, and the other a habeas corpus proceeding, the parties cross-appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 25, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination which, inter alia, granted custody of the infant children of the parties to the respondent-appellant mother. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The record amply supports the finding by Special Term that the mother is a fit custodian and is entitled to custody of the children returned to her. We have examined her contentions with respect to her application for counsel fees and find them to be without merit. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 600, 375 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loomis-v-loomis-nyappdiv-1975.