Loomer v. Scott

1914 OK 280, 141 P. 1107, 43 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 493
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 16, 1914·No. 6324·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

KANE, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, in support of which there is an uncontradicted affidavit to the effect that the appeal in this cause now involves only moot questions of law, the determination of which can have no practical results. This is sufficient ground for sustaining the motion to dismiss. Bryan v. Sullivan, 29 Okla. 686, 119 Pac. 124; McCullough et al. v. Gilcrease, 40 Okla. 741, 141 Pac. 5.

The motion to dismiss is therefore sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loomer v. Scott, 1914 OK 280, 141 P. 1107, 43 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 493 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 280 (Loomer v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sarber v. Anderson
1933 OK 149 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
City of Sapulpa v. Carnes
1933 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Pitts v. People's Nat. Bank of Checotah
1918 OK 509 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Reed v. Mullen
1916 OK 426 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)