Look v. Inhabitants of Industry

51 Me. 375
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1863·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Rice, J.

The case finds that the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of Industry on the first day of April, 1858, and therefore was not liable to be assessed as such for that year. It also finds that the tax was paid under duress, and the money has gone into the treasury of the defendants. Under such circumstances, upon common principles, the corporation having received the money of the plaintiff, to which they have no right, and placed it in their treasury, are liable to refund it in • this action. Sumner v. First Parish in Dorchester, 4 Pick., 461; Thorndike v. Boston, 1 Met., 242; Briggs v. Lewiston, 29 Maine, 472. We find no authority for requiring a special demand before commencing the action. Exceptions overruled, and

Judgment on the verdict.

Appleton, G-oodenow, Davis and Walton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Look v. Inhabitants of Industry, 51 Me. 375 (Me. 1863).

51 Me. 375 (Look v. Inhabitants of Industry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berry v. Daigle
322 A.2d 320 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1974)
Rath v. City of Chicago
207 Ill. App. 117 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917)
Daniels v. Township of Watertown
21 N.W. 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)