Lonzie Pittman v. Joe S. Hopper, Warden, Georgia State Prison
This text of 555 F.2d 551 (Lonzie Pittman v. Joe S. Hopper, Warden, Georgia State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, attacks his 1963 state conviction and sentence on the following grounds: (1) The juries which indicted and convicted him were unconstitutionally constituted because of the systematic exclusion of blacks; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his counsel failed to consider a challenge to the composition of the grand and petit juries.
The trial court, after an évidentiary hearing, found petitioner’s contentions to be without merit. This finding is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 F.2d 551, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonzie-pittman-v-joe-s-hopper-warden-georgia-state-prison-ca5-1977.