Lonniel L.G. v. Tammy G.G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lonniel L.G. v. Tammy G.G.

39 A.D.3d 1200, 832 N.Y.S.2d 843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 A.D.3d 1200 (Lonniel L.G. v. Tammy G.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lonniel L.G. v. Tammy G.G., 39 A.D.3d 1200, 832 N.Y.S.2d 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., A.J.), entered [1201]*1201June 15, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, found respondent to be in willful violation of a custody/visitation order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Family Court erred in finding respondent to be in willful violation of a custody/visitation order dated December 10, 2004 and in sentencing her to an intermittent term of incarceration of two weekends. The violation petition alleges that respondent violated a different order, dated February 24, 2006, and, in any event, the evidence does not establish that respondent willfully violated a clear mandate of either order (see Matter of Johnson v Ahern, 29 AD3d 1101 [2006]; Matter of Hoglund v Hoglund, 234 AD2d 794, 795-796 [1996]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., A.J.), entered [1201]*1201June 15, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, found respondent to be in willful violation of a custody/visitation order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Family Court erred in finding respondent to be in willful violation of a custody/visitation order dated December 10, 2004 and in sentencing her to an intermittent term of incarceration of two weekends. The violation petition alleges that respondent violated a different order, dated February 24, 2006, and, in any event, the evidence does not establish that respondent willfully violated a clear mandate of either order (see Matter of Johnson v Ahern, 29 AD3d 1101 [2006]; Matter of Hoglund v Hoglund, 234 AD2d 794, 795-796 [1996]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.3d 1200, 832 N.Y.S.2d 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonniel-lg-v-tammy-gg-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack