Lonnie Wallace v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 2003
Docket13-03-00593-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lonnie Wallace v. State (Lonnie Wallace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lonnie Wallace v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



NUMBERS 13-03-592-CR and 13-03-593-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG



____________________________________________________________________

LONNIE WALLACE , Appellant,

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 24th District Court



of Jackson County, Texas.



___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza



Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, LONNIE WALLACE , attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas. Sentences in these causes were imposed on May 29, 2003 . Untimely motions for new trial were filed on October 3, 2003. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on June 30, 2003 , but were not filed until September 18, 2003 . Said notices of appeal are untimely filed. Appellant filed untimely motions to extend time to file motion for new trial and notice of appeal on October 3, 2003 .

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and motions requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, and appellant's untimely motions, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant's untimely motions to extend time to file motion for new trial and notice of appeal are dismissed. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23rd day of October, 2003 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lonnie Wallace v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonnie-wallace-v-state-texapp-2003.