LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.

299 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 648, 2009 WL 1383673

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketED 92017

StatusPublished

This text of 299 S.W.3d 301 (LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co., 299 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 648, 2009 WL 1383673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Lonnie Snelling, appearing pro se, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE, on plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*302 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion to strike the statement of facts in defendant’s brief is denied. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a supplemental legal file is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Lonnie Snelling, appearing pro se, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE, on plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*302 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion to strike the statement of facts in defendant’s brief is denied. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a supplemental legal file is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 648, 2009 WL 1383673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonnie-snelling-v-union-elec-co-moctapp-2009.