LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.

299 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 648, 2009 WL 1383673

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 2009·No. ED 92017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Lonnie Snelling, appearing pro se, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE, on plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*302 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion to strike the statement of facts in defendant’s brief is denied. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a supplemental legal file is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Lonnie Snelling, appearing pro se, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE, on plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*302 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion to strike the statement of facts in defendant’s brief is denied. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a supplemental legal file is denied.

LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co., 299 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 648, 2009 WL 1383673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

299 S.W.3d 301 (LONNIE SNELLING v. Union Elec. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.