Lonnie Ray Carter v. Louis Menke Harold Lee, Officer James Blodgett, Superintendent, Russ Bartlett, Counselor

66 F.3d 334, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31665, 1995 WL 536298
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 1995
Docket94-35943
StatusUnpublished

This text of 66 F.3d 334 (Lonnie Ray Carter v. Louis Menke Harold Lee, Officer James Blodgett, Superintendent, Russ Bartlett, Counselor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lonnie Ray Carter v. Louis Menke Harold Lee, Officer James Blodgett, Superintendent, Russ Bartlett, Counselor, 66 F.3d 334, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31665, 1995 WL 536298 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

66 F.3d 334

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lonnie Ray CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis MENKE; Harold Lee, Officer; James Blodgett,
Superintendent, Russ Bartlett, Counselor,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-35943.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 5, 1995.*
Decided Sept. 8, 1995.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Washington state prisoner Lonnie Ray Carter appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging due process violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted in full by the district court.1

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

1

Carter's motions for appointment of counsel and extension of time to file a reply brief are denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,708
66 F.3d 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 F.3d 334, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31665, 1995 WL 536298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonnie-ray-carter-v-louis-menke-harold-lee-officer-james-blodgett-ca9-1995.