Longstreth v. City of Philadelphia

91 A. 667, 245 Pa. 233, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 867
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 4, 1914·No. Appeal, No. 354·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam,

The court below found as a fact that appellants’ decedent, who had a contract with the City of Philadelphia in connection with the construction of a sewer, had been fully paid for all the work called for by his contract, and that, as he had done nothing additional, there was no moral obligation resting upon the city to pay him more. Under this finding, which is not to be disturbed, because sustained by the evidence, the ordinance of the city councils, awarding him more, was invalid: O’Rourke v. Philadelphia, 211 Pa. 79; Cunningham v. Dunlap, 242 Pa. 341.

Decree affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longstreth v. City of Philadelphia, 91 A. 667, 245 Pa. 233, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 867 (Pa. 1914).

91 A. 667 (Longstreth v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denbow v. Borough of Leetsdale
729 A.2d 1113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Coole v. State
4 Ct. Cl. 206 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1948)
Harbold v. Reading
49 A.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Bishop v. Pittman
33 Haw. 647 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1935)