Longson v. Beaux-Arts Apartments, Inc.

265 A.D. 951, 38 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697

This text of 265 A.D. 951 (Longson v. Beaux-Arts Apartments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Longson v. Beaux-Arts Apartments, Inc., 265 A.D. 951, 38 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinions

Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs, with the following memo: I do not believe that this case can be decided upon the authority of any of the cited decisions. In my opinion the original contract (Bx. A., the first preferred stock) determines the controversy. There it is provided that two-thirds of the stockholders may modify the contract (paragraphs XV and XVI, Ex. A.). The stockholders have met and more than two-[952]*952thirds (actually 96%) have consented to the reorganization plan, and the plaintiff is bound by their action. Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to direct judgment for plaintiff, as set forth in opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davison v. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.
35 N.E.2d 618 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
Roberts v. . Roberts-Wicks Co.
77 N.E. 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Matter of Duer
1 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Wiedersum v. Atlantic Cement Products, Inc.
261 A.D. 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 951, 38 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longson-v-beaux-arts-apartments-inc-nyappdiv-1942.