Longoria v. State

268 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 234, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 110
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 1925·No. No. 8620.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

*235 There is on file no brief for appellant. The record shows no exceptions taken to the charge of the court, or to the introduction or rejection of evidence. The only question left for our consideration is the sufficiency of the facts. The undisputed testimony shows appellant to have been in possession of several quarts of whiskey and that he sold a quart to a State witness for five dollars. The evidence seems ample to support the conclusion reached by the jury.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longoria v. State, 268 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 234, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 110 (Tex. 1925).

268 S.W. 1118 (Longoria v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.