Longoria, Ex Parte Andres Gomez
This text of Longoria, Ex Parte Andres Gomez (Longoria, Ex Parte Andres Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,930
EX PARTE ANDRES GOMEZ LONGORIA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 06-8-22,681-D IN THE 377TH DISTRICT COURT FROM VICTORIA COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and was
sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Longoria v. State, 13-07-00436-CR (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi del. Dec. 18, 2008).
Applicant raises several claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and he also contends
he was denied his right to pursue a petition for discretionary review. This Court remanded the
application to the trial court for findings. Appellate counsel, who was also trial counsel, filed an
affidavit with the trial court responding to the claims. Based on counsel’s affidavit, the trial court -2-
has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law indicating that Applicant was not timely advised
of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25
(Tex.Crim. App. 1997).
We hold, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition
for discretionary review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 13-07-
00436-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 06-8-22,681-D from the 377th District Court
of Victoria County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within
30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are
dismissed without prejudice.
Delivered: December 12, 2012 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Longoria, Ex Parte Andres Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longoria-ex-parte-andres-gomez-texcrimapp-2012.