Longo v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

407 F.2d 401, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 8962
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 1969
DocketNo. 285, Docket 30043
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 401 (Longo v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Longo v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 407 F.2d 401, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 8962 (2d Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in this case is the right of Marra Brothers, Inc., who had, through its stevedoring subcontract with Wm. Spencer & Son Corp., stevedore, become liable for a recovery by Longo for persona] injuries against Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., shipowner, which had in turn been indemnified by the Spencer Corp., to counter-claim against its employee Longo, who was found to have been 75% eontributorily negligent. The trial court held that Marra Brothers [402]*402could not, and dismissed its counterclaim. Marra Brothers has appealed. Meanwhile, this court has heard and decided the same issue in another case and reached the same conclusion as to the applicable law. McLaughlin v. Trelleborgs Angfartygs, 408 F.2d 1334, decided January 30,1969. The judgment of the district court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F.2d 401, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 8962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longo-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-ca2-1969.