Longo v. City of New York

594 N.E.2d 930, 79 N.Y.2d 1011, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1458
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 5, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (178 AD2d 253).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longo v. City of New York, 594 N.E.2d 930, 79 N.Y.2d 1011, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1458 (N.Y. 1992).

594 N.E.2d 930 (Longo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. Board of Trustees
681 N.E.2d 382 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
673 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)