Longley v. Thailing

Ohio Supreme Court

Longley v. Thailing

2011 Ohio 5755, 130 Ohio St. 3d 352

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2011·No. 2010-1844·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Barbee v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 130 Ohio St.3d 96, 2011-Ohio-4914, 955 N.E.2d 995.

*353 Plevin & Gallucci, Frank Gallucci III, and Michael Shroge; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellants. Williams, Moliterno & Scully Co., L.P.A., and Joseph H. Wantz, for appellee. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Barbee v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 130 Ohio St.3d 96, 2011-Ohio-4914, 955 N.E.2d 995.

*353 Plevin & Gallucci, Frank Gallucci III, and Michael Shroge; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellants. Williams, Moliterno & Scully Co., L.P.A., and Joseph H. Wantz, for appellee. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Longley v. Thailing, 2011 Ohio 5755, 130 Ohio St. 3d 352 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

2011 Ohio 5755 (Longley v. Thailing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related