Longley v. Thailing

2011 Ohio 5755, 130 Ohio St. 3d 352
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 2011
Docket2010-1844
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 5755 (Longley v. Thailing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Longley v. Thailing, 2011 Ohio 5755, 130 Ohio St. 3d 352 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Barbee v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 130 Ohio St.3d 96, 2011-Ohio-4914, 955 N.E.2d 995.

*353 Plevin & Gallucci, Frank Gallucci III, and Michael Shroge; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellants. Williams, Moliterno & Scully Co., L.P.A., and Joseph H. Wantz, for appellee. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barbee v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
2011 Ohio 4914 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 5755, 130 Ohio St. 3d 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longley-v-thailing-ohio-2011.