Longley v. Suffield Academy, No. Cv01 0809999 S (Oct. 15, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 13172
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 15, 2002·No. No. CV01 0809999 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE (#114)
Motion granted as to Count One. The conduct alleged does not rise to the level of intolerable and exceeding all bounds of civilized decency. See Appleton v. Board of Education, 254 Conn. 205 (2000).

Motion granted as to Count Two. No tortious conduct in the actual termination is alleged. Perodeau v. Hartford, 259 Conn. 729 (2002).

Motion granted as to Count Eight. No explicit statutory, constitutional or judicially conceived violation of public policy has been alleged.Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, 260 Conn. 691, 699 (2002).

Motion to strike Count Ten granted. No criminal or unlawful act or means is alleged. Williams v. Maislen, 116 Conn. 433 (1933).

____________, J. Beach CT Page 13173

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longley v. Suffield Academy, No. Cv01 0809999 S (Oct. 15, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 13172 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 13172 (Longley v. Suffield Academy, No. Cv01 0809999 S (Oct. 15, 2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Maislen
165 A. 455 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)
Appleton v. Board of Education
757 A.2d 1059 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Perodeau v. City of Hartford
792 A.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLC
802 A.2d 731 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)