Longken, Inc. v. City of Long Beach

244 A.D. 728
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On the agreed statement of facts, judgment directed for defendants, with costs. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Young and Johnston, JJ., dissent in so far as this decision sustains the statute in question in its entirety, being of the opinion that the property owners whose properties are assessed for the improvement are entitled to have deducted from the aggregate cost of the improvement, [729] at the time of the assessment, the entire amount agreed to be donated or granted to the city by the Federal government, and that, therefore, the provisions of section 3 of the statute in question,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longken, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 244 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 728 (Longken, Inc. v. City of Long Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Tick Realty Corp. v. City of Long Beach
258 A.D. 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)