Longendorfer v. Wenerowicz

39 A.3d 995, 614 Pa. 697, 2012 WL 798809, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 2012·No. 146 EM 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record. Finally, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longendorfer v. Wenerowicz, 39 A.3d 995, 614 Pa. 697, 2012 WL 798809, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 537 (Pa. 2012).

39 A.3d 995 (Longendorfer v. Wenerowicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)