Home/Third Circuit/Longenberger v. Jumper

Longenberger v. Jumper

947 F.2d 936, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27325, 1991 WL 228140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 1991
Docket91-5330
StatusPublished

This text of 947 F.2d 936 (Longenberger v. Jumper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Longenberger v. Jumper, 947 F.2d 936, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27325, 1991 WL 228140 (3d Cir. 1991).

Opinion

947 F.2d 936

Longenberger (Barry, Beverly)
v.
Jumper (Harry), Smith (Theodore), Sutliff (Rosemary), Samsel
(Douglas), Orner (Robert), McCreary (Jay), Waltman
(William), Cole (Gary), Schalles (Rodney), Markle (Lester),
Zoning Hearing Board of Borough of Nescopeck, Council of
Nescopeck, Borough of Nescopeck

NO. 91-5330

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

OCT 21, 1991

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,

Conaboy, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
947 F.2d 936, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27325, 1991 WL 228140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longenberger-v-jumper-ca3-1991.