Longa v. Eskimo Freeze, Inc.

468 So. 2d 468, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13886
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1985·No. Nos. 84-1663, 84-1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff was personally injured as he traversed a plywood ramp at the door of defendant’s business premises and fell. The trial court, following jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, entered a directed verdict in favor of defendant.

We have reviewed the record in light of appellate advice and are of the firm opinion that, using the appropriate standards, a jury question was presented as to defendant’s negligence. More particularly, the degree to which plaintiff caused his own injuries because of his awareness of the ramp and the manner in which he undertook to negotiate it was an issue of comparative negligence to be determined by the jury. See Ferber v. Orange Blossom Center, Inc., 388 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict.

Reversed and remanded.

ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Longa v. Eskimo Freeze, Inc., 468 So. 2d 468, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

468 So. 2d 468 (Longa v. Eskimo Freeze, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibbs v. Hernandez
810 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)