Longa v. Eskimo Freeze, Inc.
This text of 468 So. 2d 468 (Longa v. Eskimo Freeze, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff was personally injured as he traversed a plywood ramp at the door of defendant’s business premises and fell. The trial court, following jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, entered a directed verdict in favor of defendant.
We have reviewed the record in light of appellate advice and are of the firm opinion that, using the appropriate standards, a jury question was presented as to defendant’s negligence. More particularly, the degree to which plaintiff caused his own injuries because of his awareness of the ramp and the manner in which he undertook to negotiate it was an issue of comparative negligence to be determined by the jury. See Ferber v. Orange Blossom Center, Inc., 388 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 So. 2d 468, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/longa-v-eskimo-freeze-inc-fladistctapp-1985.