Long v. Wallmow
277 N.W. 704, 226 Wis. 660, 1938 Wisc. LEXIS 40
Opinion
When the cause was called for argument on January 10, 1938, the appellants were present by their attorneys. The respondents were not. No brief having been [662]*662filed or submitted by the respondents, the order appealed from is reversed under Rule 32, which provides:
“When a cause is submitted or presented by counsel for appellant or plaintiff in error, but not by the opposing party, the judgment or order appealed from may be reversed as of course, without argument.”
That part of the order appealed from is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long v. Wallmow, 277 N.W. 704, 226 Wis. 660, 1938 Wisc. LEXIS 40 (Wis. 1938).
277 N.W. 704 (Long v. Wallmow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cihlar v. Harvey
133 N.W.2d 815 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1965)
Beck v. Wallmow
277 N.W. 705 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1938)