Long v. United States

162 F.2d 717, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1947·No. No. 10394·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On appeal from an order denying a motion to again correct a sentence previously corrected at the instance of the appellant, and for a writ of habeas corpus, and it appearing that the circumstances are not distinguishable from those involved in Coy v. United States, 6 Cir., 156 F.2d 293, and nothing appearing to cast doubt upon the soundness of the decision in the Coy case, wherefore upon the authority of the Coy case and Holbrook v. United States, 8 Cir., 136 F.2d 649, it is ordered that the judgment below be, and it is in all respects, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. United States, 162 F.2d 717, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172 (6th Cir. 1947).

162 F.2d 717 (Long v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holbrook v. United States
136 F.2d 649 (Eighth Circuit, 1943)
Coy v. United States
156 F.2d 293 (Sixth Circuit, 1946)