Long v. United States
This text of 162 F.2d 717 (Long v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal from an order denying a motion to again correct a sentence previously corrected at the instance of the appellant, and for a writ of habeas corpus, and it appearing that the circumstances are not distinguishable from those involved in Coy v. United States, 6 Cir., 156 F.2d 293, and nothing appearing to cast doubt upon the soundness of the decision in the Coy case, wherefore upon the authority of the Coy case and Holbrook v. United States, 8 Cir., 136 F.2d 649, it is ordered that the judgment below be, and it is in all respects, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 F.2d 717, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-united-states-ca6-1947.