Long v. The Seatrain New Orleans

127 F.2d 878, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014, 1942 A.M.C. 721
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 23, 1942·No. No. 9975·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the libel, that libellant appellant was given the notice required by, was discharged in accordance with, and was paid the wages due him under, the shipping articles, the district judge, in response to an exception that no cause of action for additional wages and penalties was shown, dismissed the libel.

The shipping articles constituted the contract of employment, Peninsular & Occidental S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 98 F.2d 411, they were reasonable and not in violation of any provision of law, and ship and crew were bound by them.

The decree was right. It is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. The Seatrain New Orleans, 127 F.2d 878, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014, 1942 A.M.C. 721 (5th Cir. 1942).

127 F.2d 878 (Long v. The Seatrain New Orleans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jon C. Bunn v. Global Marine, Inc.
428 F.2d 40 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
In re Karlsson
302 F. Supp. 628 (N.D. California, 1969)
Aird v. Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co.
169 F.2d 606 (Third Circuit, 1948)
Mason v. Texas Co.
76 F. Supp. 318 (D. Massachusetts, 1948)