Long v. Swackhamer

538 P.2d 587, 91 Nev. 498, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 690
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 31, 1975
DocketNo. 7813
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 P.2d 587 (Long v. Swackhamer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Swackhamer, 538 P.2d 587, 91 Nev. 498, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 690 (Neb. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Jack Long and the Independent American Party sought mandamus in this court to compel the Secretary of State to accept and file Long’s declaration of candidacy for the office of lieutenant governor. We ordered the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus, but, because of the exigencies presented, we reserved the filing of an opinion to a later date.

Long, a resident of Nevada for more than 5 years and a qualified Nevada elector, attempted to file his candidacy for the office of lieutenant governor in the Nevada general elections as a representative of the Independent American Party. Long was qualified to file for the office pursuant to NRS 224.010.1 However, the Secretary of State refused to accept his candidacy on the ground that Long, who had been a Republican, had changed his party affiliation after September [500]*5001, 1973. NRS 293.176.2 Since the Independent American Party had not become qualified as a political party in Nevada until June 25, 1974", we find the statute inapposite, and conclude that the Secretary of State erred in refusing to accept Long’s candidacy for that reason.

Petitioners have suggested that, since Long was the only candidate filing for the office of lieutenant governor on the Independent American Party ticket, his name would not appear on the primary ballots, and he was therefore exempt from the proscriptions of NRS 293.176, which is directed to primary elections only.3 However, by placing emphasis on the “primary election” language of the statute, Respondent Secretary of State was faced with an impossible situation. For instance, had he accepted Long’s filing on July 12, several days before the filings closed, he would have been in error. On the other hand, by not accepting Long’s filing and had no one else filed, he was in error.

We believe, and so hold, that NRS 293.176 has no application at all to a new political party coming into existence after September 1 of the preceding year.

A qualified political party that has met standards for qualification should be afforded an opportunity to express its views at election time through its candidates.

NRS 293.127 provides:

“This Title [Title 24, Elections, of NRS] shall be liberally construed to the end that all electors shall have an opportunity [501]*501to participate in elections and that the real will of the electors may not be defeated by an informality or by failure substantially to comply with the provisions of this Title with respect to the giving of any notice or the conducting of an election or certifying the results thereof.”

The right of citizens to associate and organize for the advancement of their political beliefs, and the right of voters, regardless of their political persuasion, to cast their votes as they wish, are two of our most precious freedoms, protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. See Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23, 30 (1968). NRS 293.176 has no application to one in the position of Petitioner Long. For these reasons, we heretofore entered the order granting a peremptory writ of mandate compelling Respondent Secretary of State to accept and file the declaration of candidacy for the office of lieutenant governor of the State of Nevada.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Independent American Party v. Lau
880 P.2d 1391 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 P.2d 587, 91 Nev. 498, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-swackhamer-nev-1975.