Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co.

224 A.2d 321, 48 N.J. 134, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 155
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 7, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 224 A.2d 321 (Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co., 224 A.2d 321, 48 N.J. 134, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 155 (N.J. 1966).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division, 92 N. J. Super. 556.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Hall, Sohettino and Haneman 6.

For affirmance — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.2d 321, 48 N.J. 134, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-sutherland-backer-co-nj-1966.