Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co.
224 A.2d 321, 48 N.J. 134, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 155
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division, 92 N. J. Super. 556.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Hall, Sohettino and Haneman 6.
For affirmance — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co., 224 A.2d 321, 48 N.J. 134, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 155 (N.J. 1966).
224 A.2d 321 (Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ALEXANDER S. CORTES VS. GARRAD CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. (L-1341-16, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Samuel Fulginiti, a Minor by His Guardian, Michael A. Marolla v. Peter Tocco and Margaret M. Tocco
462 F.2d 654 (Third Circuit, 1972)