Long v. State

159 S.W. 846, 71 Tex. Crim. 209, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Long v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 Tex. Crim. 426
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1913·No. No. 2609.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, his punishment being assessed at death.

There are quite a number of grounds set out in the motion for new trial. Most of these are criticisms of the court’s charge as not submitting the law properly as called for by the facts, or properly submitting the law under the facts detailed by the witnesses. The evidence is not before us. There is no statement of facts sent up with this transcript. These matters urged in the motion for new trial can not be revised in the absence of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 159 S.W. 846, 71 Tex. Crim. 209, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404 (Tex. 1913).

159 S.W. 846 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.