Long v. State

569 S.W.3d 468
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 4, 2018
DocketNo. ED 106458
StatusPublished

This text of 569 S.W.3d 468 (Long v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. State, 569 S.W.3d 468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Long ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial of her Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. Movant claims her five-year sentence for felony stealing was illegal under the holding in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), because she received a sentence greater than the maximum sentence authorized by law. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell
497 S.W.3d 263 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 S.W.3d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-state-moctapp-2018.