Long v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Long v. State

569 S.W.3d 468

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2018·No. No. ED 106458·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Long ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial of her Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. Movant claims her five-year sentence for felony stealing was illegal under the holding in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), because she received a sentence greater than the maximum sentence authorized by law. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Long ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial of her Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. Movant claims her five-year sentence for felony stealing was illegal under the holding in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), because she received a sentence greater than the maximum sentence authorized by law. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Long v. State, 569 S.W.3d 468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

569 S.W.3d 468 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related